[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08f01199-ad0f-446c-0bcf-187dc31f2b42@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:21:03 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>, mst@...hat.com,
makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when
enable busyloop
On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>>
>> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
>> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
>> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
>>
>> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
>>
>> Tonghao Zhang (6):
>> net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
>> net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
>> net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
>> net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
>> net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
>> net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
>>
>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 +++-----
>> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
> ping ?
HI Tonghao:
As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need
to resend the series.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists