lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNWp2Q3kSregdsEn6uUaeV9mjnnmPBpWGSGon_v2iz_WMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:51:47 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when
 enable busyloop

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
> >> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> >>
> >> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
> >> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
> >> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
> >>
> >> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
> >>
> >> Tonghao Zhang (6):
> >>    net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
> >>    net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
> >>    net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
> >>    net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
> >>    net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
> >>    net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
> >>
> >>   drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
> >>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
> > ping ?
>
> HI Tonghao:
>
> As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need
> to resend the series.
OK
> Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ