[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1694684.hdcNQnb4e4@blindfold>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 17:56:41 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
bernhard.thaler@...et.at, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bridge: remove BR_GROUPFWD_RESTRICTED for arbitrary forwarding of reserved addresses
Nikolay,
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018, 16:59:31 CEST schrieb Nikolay Aleksandrov:
> Richard please check commit:
> commit 5af48b59f35c
> Author: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Wed Sep 27 16:12:44 2017 +0300
>
> net: bridge: add per-port group_fwd_mask with less restrictions
>
> We need to be able to transparently forward most link-local frames via
> tunnels (e.g. vxlan, qinq). Currently the bridge's group_fwd_mask has a
> mask which restricts the forwarding of STP and LACP, but we need to be able
> to forward these over tunnels and control that forwarding on a per-port
> basis thus add a new per-port group_fwd_mask option which only disallows
> mac pause frames to be forwarded (they're always dropped anyway).
> The patch does not change the current default situation - all of the others
> are still restricted unless configured for forwarding.
> We have successfully tested this patch with LACP and STP forwarding over
> VxLAN and qinq tunnels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
>
> Will this work for you ?
> It's in the bridge since v4.15.
Hmm, I *think* this is exactly what I need.
To understand it correctly, I have to set per port group_fwd_mask for both slaves
of the bridge then it will forward anything (except for PAUSE frames)?
Is there a reason why this knob is not documented in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net?
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists