[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMjX22Qju2JSN0wGd067JarPM+C3v4TFJu3Y8LzhtUHxcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:23:10 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 08/15] ice: Notify VF of link status change
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:46 PM Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
> From: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>
>
> When PF gets a link status change event, notify the VFs of the same.
so you always want to block east/west traffic when the uplink is down? why?
The correct approach is to have vf/vport e-switch representor on the
host, and if
the host admin puts down the administrative link of the rep -- the vf
operational link (carrier)
goes down.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists