[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2208861-381c-1f6a-edfe-94d93a80e749@vyatta.att-mail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:56:59 +0100
From: Mike Manning <mmanning@...tta.att-mail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: revert degradation in IPv6 Ready Logo test
results
On 02/10/2018 19:26, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Manning <mmanning@...tta.att-mail.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:40:30 +0100
>
>> This reverts commit 0ed4229b08c1 ("ipv6: defrag: drop non-last frags
>> smaller than min mtu"). While one should not get fragments smaller than
>> the IPv6 minimum MTU, not handling crafted packets in the TAHI IPv6
>> conformance test suite (v6eval) for IPv6 Ready Logo results in 18
>> failures representing over 5% of the score.
>>
>> Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Manning <mmanning@...tta.att-mail.com>
> Sorry, I'm not just going to blindly apply a patch because some
> TAHI tests fail.
>
> It's possible the TAHI tests are wrong, or that the specification
> elements it is testing don't make any sense these days.
>
> Allowing all kinds of random junk in the middle of the fragment queue
> leads to lots of unnecessary cpu overhead and potential bugs, and it
> triggerable remotely.
Understood, thank you.
It would be great if there is someone on this mailer who has influence
with ipv6ready.org so as to get the TAHI tests for IPv6 conformance
updated, as an upgrade to a kernel with the commit mentioned will result
in a 5% degradation in results for the existing tests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists