netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f64e7857-739d-0c06-6a3f-57db11ad1566@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:24:29 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mfo@...onical.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb_dump() for shorter
 family headers

On 10/5/18 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@...onical.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
>> <mfo@...onical.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, thanks for your suggestions.
>>> I'll do some research/learning on them, and give it a try for a v2.
>>
>> FYI, that is "[PATCH v2 net-next] rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb_dump() for
>> ndmsg header".
>>
>> BTW, could please advise whether this should be net or net-next? It's a bug fix,
>> but it's late in the cycle, and this is not urgent (the problem has been around
>> since v4.12), so not sure it's really needed for v4.19.
> 
> I've applied this to net and queued it up for -stable, thanks.
> 

there was a v2 for this problem. I reviewed it and been testing it as
part of the strict dump patches.