[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181008.104620.1421575286346618790.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dsahern@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv6: stop leaking percpu memory in fib6
info
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:06:03 +0300
> The fib6_info_alloc() function allocates percpu memory to hold per CPU
> pointers to rt6_info, but this memory is never freed. Fix it.
>
> Fixes: a64efe142f5e ("net/ipv6: introduce fib6_info struct and helpers")
>
Please do not put empty lines between Fixes: and other tags. They
belong together as a group.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Several problems here.
You cannot submit patches to net-next and expect them to go onward to
-stable. That is not appropriate. If it is going to stable, you
must target 'net' not 'net-next'.
Furthermore, for networking changes, explicit CC: of stable is not
appropriate. Instead you must explicitly ask me to queue the patch
up for -stable as I handle networking stable submissions myself.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists