lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:34:05 -0700
From:   Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
To:     mauricio.vasquez@...ito.it
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: add MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM syscall

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:48 AM Mauricio Vasquez
<mauricio.vasquez@...ito.it> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2018 11:48 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:06 AM Mauricio Vasquez B
> > <mauricio.vasquez@...ito.it> wrote:
> >> The following patch implements a bpf queue/stack maps that
> >> provides the peek/pop/push functions.  There is not a direct
> >> relationship between those functions and the current maps
> >> syscalls, hence a new MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM syscall is added,
> >> this is mapped to the pop operation in the queue/stack maps
> >> and it is still to implement in other kind of maps.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B <mauricio.vasquez@...ito.it>
> >> ---
> >>   include/linux/bpf.h      |    1 +
> >>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |    1 +
> >>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c     |   82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   3 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> >> index 9b558713447f..5793f0c7fbb5 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> >> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
> >>          void *(*map_lookup_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
> >>          int (*map_update_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
> >>          int (*map_delete_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
> >> +       void *(*map_lookup_and_delete_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
> >>
> >>          /* funcs called by prog_array and perf_event_array map */
> >>          void *(*map_fd_get_ptr)(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> >> index f9187b41dff6..3bb94aa2d408 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> >> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ enum bpf_cmd {
> >>          BPF_BTF_LOAD,
> >>          BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID,
> >>          BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY,
> >> +       BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM,
> >>   };
> >>
> >>   enum bpf_map_type {
> >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> index f36c080ad356..6907d661dea5 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> @@ -980,6 +980,85 @@ static int map_get_next_key(union bpf_attr *attr)
> >>          return err;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +#define BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM_LAST_FIELD value
> >> +
> >> +static int map_lookup_and_delete_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
> >> +{
> >> +       void __user *ukey = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->key);
> >> +       void __user *uvalue = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->value);
> >> +       int ufd = attr->map_fd;
> >> +       struct bpf_map *map;
> >> +       void *key, *value, *ptr;
> >> +       u32 value_size;
> >> +       struct fd f;
> >> +       int err;
> >> +
> >> +       if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM))
> >> +               return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +       f = fdget(ufd);
> >> +       map = __bpf_map_get(f);
> >> +       if (IS_ERR(map))
> >> +               return PTR_ERR(map);
> >> +
> >> +       if (!(f.file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_WRITE)) {
> >> +               err = -EPERM;
> >> +               goto err_put;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       key = __bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
> >> +       if (IS_ERR(key)) {
> >> +               err = PTR_ERR(key);
> >> +               goto err_put;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       value_size = map->value_size;
> >> +
> >> +       err = -ENOMEM;
> >> +       value = kmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
> >> +       if (!value)
> >> +               goto free_key;
> >> +
> >> +       err = -EFAULT;
> >> +       if (copy_from_user(value, uvalue, value_size) != 0)
> >> +               goto free_value;
> >> +
> >> +       /* must increment bpf_prog_active to avoid kprobe+bpf triggering from
> >> +        * inside bpf map update or delete otherwise deadlocks are possible
> >> +        */
> >> +       preempt_disable();
> >> +       __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
> >> +       if (map->ops->map_lookup_and_delete_elem) {
> >> +               rcu_read_lock();
> >> +               ptr = map->ops->map_lookup_and_delete_elem(map, key);
> >> +               if (ptr)
> >> +                       memcpy(value, ptr, value_size);
> > I think we are exposed to race condition with push and pop in parallel.
> > map_lookup_and_delete_elem() only updates the head/tail, so it gives
> > no protection for the buffer pointed by ptr.
>
> queue/stack maps does not use this 'ptr', the pop operation directly
> copies the value into the buffer allocated in map_lookup_and_delete_elem().
> The copy from the queue/stack buffer into 'value' and the head/tail
> update are protected by a spinlock in the queue/stack maps implementation.
>
> On the other hand, future implementation of map_lookup_and_delete
> operation in other kind of maps should guarantee that the return ptr is
> rcu protected.
>
> Does it make sense to you?

I reread the other patch, and found it does NOT use the following logic for
queue and stack:

               rcu_read_lock();
               ptr = map->ops->map_lookup_and_delete_elem(map, key);
               if (ptr)
                       memcpy(value, ptr, value_size);

I guess this part is not used at all? Can we just remove it?

Thanks,
Song






> >
> >> +               rcu_read_unlock();
> >> +               err = ptr ? 0 : -ENOENT;
> >> +       } else {
> >> +               err = -ENOTSUPP;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
> >> +       preempt_enable();
> >> +
> >> +       if (err)
> >> +               goto free_value;
> >> +
> >> +       if (copy_to_user(uvalue, value, value_size) != 0)
> >> +               goto free_value;
> >> +
> >> +       err = 0;
> >> +
> >> +free_value:
> >> +       kfree(value);
> >> +free_key:
> >> +       kfree(key);
> >> +err_put:
> >> +       fdput(f);
> >> +       return err;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static const struct bpf_prog_ops * const bpf_prog_types[] = {
> >>   #define BPF_PROG_TYPE(_id, _name) \
> >>          [_id] = & _name ## _prog_ops,
> >> @@ -2453,6 +2532,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz
> >>          case BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY:
> >>                  err = bpf_task_fd_query(&attr, uattr);
> >>                  break;
> >> +       case BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM:
> >> +               err = map_lookup_and_delete_elem(&attr);
> >> +               break;
> >>          default:
> >>                  err = -EINVAL;
> >>                  break;
> >>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ