lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb26ebd1-19e3-e72a-2d90-3793889a635e@6wind.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:48:05 +0200
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ip6_tunnel: Don't update PMTU on tunnels with
 collect_md

Le 12/10/2018 à 18:34, Stefano Brivio a écrit :
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:58:55 +0200
> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
[snip]
>> Could you explain in your commit log which problem your patch fixes?
> 
> Nothing really.
> 
> The change in f15ca723c1eb looked accidental and I thought it doesn't
> make sense to update the PMTU in that case, but I didn't figure out
> it's not actually done anyway.
> 
> Maybe it makes things a bit more readable, in that case I'd target it
> for net-next. What do you think?
> 
I don't think that this patch helps. The purpose of the skb_dst_update_pmtu()
helper is to hide those things. If one day, update_pmtu is defined for
md_dst_op, I bet that we won't remove this test.


Regards,
Nicolas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ