lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181015.214320.807689629924469586.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     pablo@...filter.org
Cc:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, amir@...ai.me, pshelar@....org,
        u9012063@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] ip_tunnel: specify tunnel type via
 template

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:24:36 +0200

> The following patchset adds a new field to the tunnel metadata template.
> This new field allows us to restrict the configuration to a given tunnel
> driver in order to catch incorrect configuration that may result in
> packets going to the wrong tunnel driver.
> 
> Changes with regards to initial RFC [1] are:
> 
> 1) Explicit tunnel type initialization to TUNNEL_TYPE_UNSPEC in existing
>    clients for this code, as requested by Daniel.
> 
> 2) Add TUNNEL_TYPE_* definition through enum tunnel_type in
>    uapi/linux/if_tunnel.h, so we don't need to redefine this in every
>    client of this infrastructure.
> 
> 3) Add TUNNEL_TYPE_IPIP, TUNNEL_TYPE_IPIP6 and TUNNEL_TYPE_IP6IP6, which
>    were missing in the original RFC.
> 
> Let me know if you any more comments, thanks.
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=153861145204094&w=2

People don't need to update a core common UAPI header to add a new
ethernet driver.

They shouldn't have to do so to add a new tunneling driver either.

But that requirement is created by this patch set.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ