[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db4ae0f0-97e4-d2c1-9ac9-e689e3d80447@rock-chips.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:29:34 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Add new device ID support
On 2018/10/24 13:54, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:48:55 +0800
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On 2018/10/24 10:19, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:46:47 +0800
>>>
>>>> It's found my r8169 ethernet card at hand has a device ID
>>>> of 0x0000 which wasn't on the list of rtl8169_pci_tbl. Add
>>>> a new entry to make it work:
>>> ...
>>>> 01:00.0 Class 0200: 10ec:0000
>>> I don't know about this.
>>> A value of zero could mean the device is mis-responding to
>>> PCI config space requests or something like that.
>>
>> It was working fine on my retired Windows XP home PC with same devcice
>> ID listed, so I guess r8169 driver for windows system knows 0x0000 is
>> also valid.
>
> It is also possible the device comes up in a different state.
>
> Under windows does it show with that device ID of zero?
yup. More precisely, I checked how BIOS enumerate it by PCIe analyzer
and see it does report 0x0000 as device ID.
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists