[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181024084710.05a5abc4@xeon-e3>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:47:10 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Add new device ID support
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:29:34 +0800
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> On 2018/10/24 13:54, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
> > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:48:55 +0800
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> On 2018/10/24 10:19, David Miller wrote:
> >>> From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
> >>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:46:47 +0800
> >>>
> >>>> It's found my r8169 ethernet card at hand has a device ID
> >>>> of 0x0000 which wasn't on the list of rtl8169_pci_tbl. Add
> >>>> a new entry to make it work:
> >>> ...
> >>>> 01:00.0 Class 0200: 10ec:0000
> >>> I don't know about this.
> >>> A value of zero could mean the device is mis-responding to
> >>> PCI config space requests or something like that.
> >>
> >> It was working fine on my retired Windows XP home PC with same devcice
> >> ID listed, so I guess r8169 driver for windows system knows 0x0000 is
> >> also valid.
> >
> > It is also possible the device comes up in a different state.
> >
> > Under windows does it show with that device ID of zero?
>
> yup. More precisely, I checked how BIOS enumerate it by PCIe analyzer
> and see it does report 0x0000 as device ID.
>
> >
> >
> >
>
Look at device manager properties of the device in Windows?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists