netdev - Re: [RFC net-next v2 0/8] indirect tc block cb registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181025125241.GD2143@nanopsycho>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:52:41 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        gerlitz.or@...il.com, ozsh@...lanox.com,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
        avivh@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 0/8] indirect tc block cb registration

Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 02:26:49PM CEST, john.hurley@...ronome.com wrote:
>This patchset introduces an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a
>driver to register for block updates when an external device (e.g. tunnel
>netdev) is bound to a TC block. Drivers can track new netdevs or register
>to existing ones to receive information on such events. Based on this,
>they may register for block offload rules using already existing
>functions.
>
>The patchset also implements this new indirect block registration in the
>NFP driver to allow the offloading of tunnel rules. The use of egdev
>offload (which is currently only used for tunnel offload) is subsequently
>removed.

John, I'm missing v1->v2 changelog. Could you please add it?

Thanks!