netdev - Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <825268591809f66eb475c3b41c327809a304388f.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:23:35 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     w@....eu, wanghaifine@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position

On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 17:02 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:46:18 -0700
> 
> > I would have suggested David reply with only his second sentence
> > and maybe a pointer to kernelnewbies or staging.is
> 
> I maintain that I was not out of line with my comment.
> 
> I sought a second opinion from Greg KH and others, and they agree with
> me that I was still kind with my choice of words.

"You can't be serious?" is kind?

> I think you're taking things too far, and I will simply not stand for
> this overreaching judgement upon my behavior on this list which is
> completely not justified.

Even above here, concision is generally better.

overreaching and completely are probably not reasonable.

openness and defensiveness are somewhat antithetic.

>From the new Code of Conduct (which I don't even approve)

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism.

cheers, Joe