netdev - Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <203ed8b3-2744-44d2-78dc-6d463acfb977@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:50:34 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     w@....eu, wanghaifine@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position

On 10/24/2018 05:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> "You can't be serious?" is kind?

Context maybe ? As a non native, I do not see why it is an offense.

I would like very much we discuss about patches here, not about whatever
interpretation you or anyone could make from any answers.

Recipe for disaster in linux community :

1) Write a bot, sending one wrong patch every hour, with a random "From:" name
  and email address.

  Yeah, can you believe a bot can actually 'Signed-off-by:' a patch ???

2) Hundred of emails sent, from reviewers, annoyed maintainers, and flames
  because the proper words for newbies were not _carefully_ chosen.

So just wait for an answer from the supposed patch author, and see what happens next.

Thank you.