[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a94796f-1760-f332-46f0-6ab0b5a0aab7@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:15:33 +0800
From: maowenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To: <rasesh.mody@...gic.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: bnx2: rx_fw_discards: BCM5716 sporadically drops packets when update
to driver version 2.2.6
Hi,
After I update version of bnx2 driver from 2.2.1 to 2.2.6, I find BCM5716 sporadically drops packets, which
shows in rx_fw_discards.
C36-141-5:~ # ethtool -S NIC0
NIC statistics:
rx_ucast_packets: 11902
rx_mcast_packets: 217
rx_bcast_packets: 4954320
rx_filtered_packets: 328793
rx_fw_discards: 2742
C36-141-5:~ #
5s later:
C36-141-5:~ # ethtool -S NIC0
NIC statistics:
rx_ucast_packets: 11910
rx_mcast_packets: 217
rx_bcast_packets: 4958117
rx_filtered_packets: 328897
rx_fw_discards: 2750
C36-141-5:~ #
so rx_fw_discards: 2742-----> rx_fw_discards: 2750, lost 8 packets.
the information of bnx2
C36-141-5:~ # modinfo bnx2
kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.ko
firmware: bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09ax-6.0.17.fw
firmware: bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-6.0.17.fw
firmware: bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw
firmware: bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-6.0.15.fw
firmware: bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.3.fw
version: 2.2.6
1) Firstly, I check the patches from 2.2.1 to 2.2.6, below patch is interesting.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0021850d0417a4dc38ed871d929b651b87e2ead9
Do not enable filter SORT MODE in chip init routine. This patch addresses an
issue where BCM5716 sporadically drops packets when changing multicast list.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
index 8957eb5f4478..8c9a8b7787d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
@@ -4984,8 +4984,6 @@ bnx2_init_chip(struct bnx2 *bp)
bp->idle_chk_status_idx = 0xffff;
- bp->rx_mode = BNX2_EMAC_RX_MODE_SORT_MODE;
-
/* Set up how to generate a link change interrupt. */
BNX2_WR(bp, BNX2_EMAC_ATTENTION_ENA, BNX2_EMAC_ATTENTION_ENA_LINK);
2) Secondly, I revert this patch, after verify it, I find rx_fw_discards does not increasing.
so I think this patch can fix current issue. But I'm not sure the issue of this patch to fix
will be reproduced?
I'm not convinced that what factor will trigger rx_fw_discards increasing?
And how to fix this?
Thanks a lot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists