[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1adfc5a696d40388ad9bf982f0ff64d@HXTBJIDCEMVIW02.hxtcorp.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:04:25 +0000
From: "Wang, Dongsheng" <dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "Zheng, Joey" <yu.zheng@...-semitech.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"robert.moore@...el.com" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: qcom/emac: add phy-handle support for ACPI
On 2018/10/26 10:37, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/25/18 9:18 PM, Wang, Dongsheng wrote:
>> But when I was reading Documentation/acpi/DSD-properties-rules.txt, my
>> understanding is we should try to conform to DT bindings. So maybe ACPI
>> doesn't have such a document, just DT bindings.
> There was an attempt to document DSDs, but it was abandoned after a while.
>
> https://github.com/ahs3/dsd
>
Yes, here's a database concept, and I asked some Intel guys, the answer
I got was there is no such database or document. :(
Cheers,
Dongsheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists