lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:13:01 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: "Wang, Dongsheng" <dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com> Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, "Zheng, Joey" <yu.zheng@...-semitech.com>, "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "robert.moore@...el.com" <robert.moore@...el.com>, "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: qcom/emac: add phy-handle support for ACPI On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:04:25AM +0000, Wang, Dongsheng wrote: > On 2018/10/26 10:37, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On 10/25/18 9:18 PM, Wang, Dongsheng wrote: > >> But when I was reading Documentation/acpi/DSD-properties-rules.txt, my > >> understanding is we should try to conform to DT bindings. So maybe ACPI > >> doesn't have such a document, just DT bindings. > > There was an attempt to document DSDs, but it was abandoned after a while. > > > > https://github.com/ahs3/dsd > > > > Yes, here's a database concept, and I asked some Intel guys, the answer > I got was there is no such database or document. :( Hi Dongsheng If there is no clear documentation for ACPI, it becomes even more important that the xgene code is refactored into a central location, and you make use of it. We really need to avoid every ACPI ethernet driver doing its own thing. Thanks Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists