[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2356588.cRoqrM3dbm@yo-gs>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:06:35 +0100
From: "Yoann P." <yoann.p.public@...il.com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ss Netid column and Local/Peer_Address
> Hi Yohann,
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 22:53:32 +0200
>
> "Yoann P." <yoann.p.public@...il.com> wrote:
> > When using ss -Hutn4 or -utn3, Netid and State columns are sometime
> > merged, it can be confusing when trying to pipe into awk or column.
>
> Thanks for fixing this. A few comments though:
> > @@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ static struct column columns[] = {
> >
> > { ALIGN_LEFT, "State", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
> > { ALIGN_LEFT, "Recv-Q", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
> > { ALIGN_LEFT, "Send-Q", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
> >
> > - { ALIGN_RIGHT, "Local Address:", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
> > + { ALIGN_RIGHT, "Local_Address:", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
> >
> > { ALIGN_LEFT, "Port", "", 0, 0, 0 },
> >
> > - { ALIGN_RIGHT, "Peer Address:", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
> > + { ALIGN_RIGHT, "Peer_Address:", " ", 0, 0, 0 },
>
> This is needed only if you pipe the output to column(1), I don't think
> it's a bug, because printing the header when you pass the output to
> column(1) makes little sense -- one should use -H then.
I don't really care about this modification, I came across it while making the
github issue example, seemed to be little change, so I dit it.
>
> By the way, why do you use column(1), when ss already prints output in
> columns? Any other issue you are working around?
column can hide columns with "-H -" and is a bit faster than awk to output a
single column according to time, it's the only reason I mentioned it.
>
> > { ALIGN_LEFT, "Port", "", 0, 0, 0 },
> > { ALIGN_LEFT, "", "", 0, 0, 0 },
> >
> > };
> >
> > @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static void sock_state_print(struct sockstat *s)
> >
> > out("`- %s", sctp_sstate_name[s->state]);
> >
> > } else {
> >
> > field_set(COL_NETID);
> >
> > - out("%s", sock_name);
> > + out("%-6s", sock_name);
>
> I could reproduce this issue with a 70-columns terminal and the options
> you gave.
>
> Anyway, I don't think this is the right way to fix it: this will waste
> one to two columns in case we have three letters for the Netid
> specifier, and won't work the day we get six-letters names. In general,
> it looks like a bad idea to reintroduce hardcoded width counts.
I agree, I just not found the proper way to do it (Not a programmer).
>
> The actual issue seems to be that in some cases the left delimiter for
> the State column is not printed, and I think you should fix that
> instead. I'll look into this within a couple of days and give you some
> more specific hints in case you still need them by then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists