[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181030120831.GC27873@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:08:31 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc: Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: xlinx: mdio: recheck condition after timeout
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:31:37AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Xilinx mdio wait functions may return false positives under certain
> circumstances: If the functions get preempted between reading the corresponding
> mdio register and checking for the timeout, they could falsely indicate a
> timeout.
Hi Kurt
I wonder if it would be possible to add a readx_poll_timeout() which
passes two parameters to op()?
I keep seeing this basic problem in various drivers, and try to point
people towards readx_poll_timeout(), but it is not the best of fit.
Otherwise, could you add a axienet_ior_read_mcr(lp), and use
readx_poll_timeout() as is?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists