| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <485c2c5d-d73e-e679-9549-aad3de02f0ab@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:43:13 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>, stefanha@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] VSOCK: support fill data to mergeable rx buffer in
host
On 2018/11/5 下午3:45, jiangyiwen wrote:
> When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature,
> it will merge big packet into rx vq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++
> 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 34bc3ab..648be39 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
> #define VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID 2
>
> enum {
> - VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES,
> + VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF),
> };
>
> /* Used to track all the vhost_vsock instances on the system. */
> @@ -80,6 +81,68 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> return vsock;
> }
>
> +static int get_rx_bufs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> + struct vring_used_elem *heads, int datalen,
> + unsigned *iovcount, unsigned int quota)
> +{
> + unsigned int out, in;
> + int seg = 0;
> + int headcount = 0;
> + unsigned d;
> + int ret;
> + /*
> + * len is always initialized before use since we are always called with
> + * datalen > 0.
> + */
> + u32 uninitialized_var(len);
> +
> + while (datalen > 0 && headcount < quota) {
> + if (unlikely(seg >= UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> + ret = -ENOBUFS;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov + seg,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov) - seg, &out,
> + &in, NULL, NULL);
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> + goto err;
> +
> + d = ret;
> + if (d == vq->num) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(out || in <= 0)) {
> + vq_err(vq, "unexpected descriptor format for RX: "
> + "out %d, in %d\n", out, in);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + heads[headcount].id = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, d);
> + len = iov_length(vq->iov + seg, in);
> + heads[headcount].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len);
> + datalen -= len;
> + ++headcount;
> + seg += in;
> + }
> +
> + heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len + datalen);
> + *iovcount = seg;
> +
> + /* Detect overrun */
> + if (unlikely(datalen > 0)) {
> + ret = UIO_MAXIOV + 1;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + return headcount;
> +err:
> + vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, headcount);
> + return ret;
> +}
Seems duplicated with the one used by vhost-net.
In packed virtqueue implementation, I plan to move this to vhost.c.
> +
> static void
> vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> @@ -87,22 +150,34 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> struct vhost_virtqueue *tx_vq = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
> bool added = false;
> bool restart_tx = false;
> + int mergeable;
> + size_t vsock_hlen;
>
> mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
>
> if (!vq->private_data)
> goto out;
>
> + mergeable = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF);
> + /*
> + * Guest fill page for rx vq in mergeable case, so it will not
> + * allocate pkt structure, we should reserve size of pkt in advance.
> + */
> + if (likely(mergeable))
> + vsock_hlen = sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_pkt);
> + else
> + vsock_hlen = sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr);
> +
> /* Avoid further vmexits, we're already processing the virtqueue */
> vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
>
> for (;;) {
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> struct iov_iter iov_iter;
> - unsigned out, in;
> + unsigned out = 0, in = 0;
> size_t nbytes;
> size_t len;
> - int head;
> + s16 headcount;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
> @@ -116,16 +191,9 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> list_del_init(&pkt->list);
> spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>
> - head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> - &out, &in, NULL, NULL);
> - if (head < 0) {
> - spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> - list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
> - spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (head == vq->num) {
> + headcount = get_rx_bufs(vq, vq->heads, vsock_hlen + pkt->len,
> + &in, likely(mergeable) ? UIO_MAXIOV : 1);
> + if (headcount <= 0) {
> spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
> spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> @@ -133,19 +201,13 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> /* We cannot finish yet if more buffers snuck in while
> * re-enabling notify.
> */
> - if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
> + if (!headcount && unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
> vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> continue;
> }
> break;
> }
>
> - if (out) {
> - virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> - vq_err(vq, "Expected 0 output buffers, got %u\n", out);
> - break;
> - }
> -
> len = iov_length(&vq->iov[out], in);
> iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, READ, &vq->iov[out], in, len);
>
> @@ -156,6 +218,19 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> break;
> }
>
> + if (likely(mergeable)) {
> + pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr.num_buffers = cpu_to_le16(headcount);
> + nbytes = copy_to_iter(&pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr,
> + sizeof(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr), &iov_iter);
> + if (nbytes != sizeof(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr)) {
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying rxbuf hdr\n");
> + break;
> + }
> + iov_iter_advance(&iov_iter, (vsock_hlen -
> + sizeof(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr) - sizeof(pkt->hdr)));
> + }
> +
> nbytes = copy_to_iter(pkt->buf, pkt->len, &iov_iter);
> if (nbytes != pkt->len) {
> virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> @@ -163,7 +238,7 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
> break;
> }
>
> - vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(pkt->hdr) + pkt->len);
> + vhost_add_used_n(vq, vq->heads, headcount);
> added = true;
Looks rather similar to vhost-net mergeable rx buffer implementation.
Another proof of using vhost-net.
Thanks
>
> if (pkt->reply) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index bf84418..da9e1fe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
>
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt {
> struct virtio_vsock_hdr hdr;
> + struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf_hdr mrg_rxbuf_hdr;
> struct work_struct work;
> struct list_head list;
> /* socket refcnt not held, only use for cancellation */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index 1d57ed3..2292f30 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct virtio_vsock_hdr {
> __le32 fwd_cnt;
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> +/* It add mergeable rx buffers feature */
> +struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf_hdr {
> + __le16 num_buffers; /* number of mergeable rx buffers */
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> enum virtio_vsock_type {
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM = 1,
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists