lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:00:45 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>, stefanha@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] VSOCK: support receive mergeable rx buffer in guest


On 2018/11/5 下午3:47, jiangyiwen wrote:
> Guest receive mergeable rx buffer, it can merge
> scatter rx buffer into a big buffer and then copy
> to user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |  9 ++++
>   net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c        | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index da9e1fe..6be3cd7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>   #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE	(1024 * 4)
>   #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_BUF_SIZE		0xFFFFFFFFUL
>   #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE		(1024 * 64)
> +/* virtio_vsock_pkt + max_pkt_len(default MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE) */
> +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_MRG_BUF_NUM ((VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) + 1)
>
>   /* Virtio-vsock feature */
>   #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF 0 /* Host can merge receive buffers. */
> @@ -48,6 +50,11 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
>   	struct list_head rx_queue;
>   };
>
> +struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf {
> +	void *buf;
> +	u32 len;
> +};
> +
>   struct virtio_vsock_pkt {
>   	struct virtio_vsock_hdr	hdr;
>   	struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf_hdr mrg_rxbuf_hdr;
> @@ -59,6 +66,8 @@ struct virtio_vsock_pkt {
>   	u32 len;
>   	u32 off;
>   	bool reply;
> +	bool mergeable;
> +	struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf mrg_rxbuf[VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_MRG_BUF_NUM];
>   };


It's better to use iov here I think, and drop buf completely.

And this is better to be done in an independent patch.


>
>   struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info {
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> index 2040a9e..3557ad3 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> @@ -359,11 +359,62 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
>   	return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq);
>   }
>
> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq,
> +		struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> +	u16 num_buf;
> +	void *page;
> +	unsigned int len;
> +	int i = 0;
> +
> +	page = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len);
> +	if (!page)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	*total_len = len;
> +	vsock->rx_buf_nr--;
> +
> +	pkt = page;
> +	num_buf = le16_to_cpu(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr.num_buffers);
> +	if (!num_buf || num_buf > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_MRG_BUF_NUM)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	pkt->mergeable = true;
> +	if (!le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len))
> +		return pkt;
> +
> +	len -= sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_pkt);
> +	pkt->mrg_rxbuf[i].buf = page + sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_pkt);
> +	pkt->mrg_rxbuf[i].len = len;
> +	i++;
> +
> +	while (--num_buf) {
> +		page = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len);
> +		if (!page)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		*total_len += len;
> +		vsock->rx_buf_nr--;
> +
> +		pkt->mrg_rxbuf[i].buf = page;
> +		pkt->mrg_rxbuf[i].len = len;
> +		i++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return pkt;
> +err:
> +	virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> +	return NULL;
> +}


Similar logic could be found at virtio-net driver.

Haven't thought this deeply, but it looks to me use virtio-net driver is 
also possible, e.g for data-path, just register vsock specific callbacks.


> +
>   static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   {
>   	struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
>   		container_of(work, struct virtio_vsock, rx_work);
>   	struct virtqueue *vq;
> +	size_t vsock_hlen = vsock->mergeable ? sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_pkt) :
> +			sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr);
>
>   	vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX];
>
> @@ -383,21 +434,29 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   				goto out;
>   			}
>
> -			pkt = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len);
> -			if (!pkt) {
> -				break;
> -			}
> +			if (likely(vsock->mergeable)) {
> +				pkt = receive_mergeable(vq, vsock, &len);
> +				if (!pkt)
> +					break;
>
> -			vsock->rx_buf_nr--;
> +				pkt->len = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len);
> +			} else {
> +				pkt = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len);
> +				if (!pkt) {
> +					break;
> +				}
> +
> +				vsock->rx_buf_nr--;
> +			}
>
>   			/* Drop short/long packets */
> -			if (unlikely(len < sizeof(pkt->hdr) ||
> -				     len > sizeof(pkt->hdr) + pkt->len)) {
> +			if (unlikely(len < vsock_hlen ||
> +				     len > vsock_hlen + pkt->len)) {
>   				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
>   				continue;
>   			}
>
> -			pkt->len = len - sizeof(pkt->hdr);
> +			pkt->len = len - vsock_hlen;
>   			virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt);
>   			virtio_transport_recv_pkt(pkt);
>   		}
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 3ae3a33..7bef1d5 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -272,14 +272,49 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_credit_update(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>   		 */
>   		spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
> -		err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, pkt->buf + pkt->off, bytes);
> -		if (err)
> -			goto out;
> +		if (pkt->mergeable) {
> +			struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf *buf = pkt->mrg_rxbuf;
> +			size_t mrg_copy_bytes, last_buf_total = 0, rxbuf_off;
> +			size_t tmp_bytes = bytes;
> +			int i;
> +
> +			for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr.num_buffers); i++) {
> +				if (pkt->off > last_buf_total + buf[i].len) {
> +					last_buf_total += buf[i].len;
> +					continue;
> +				}
> +
> +				rxbuf_off = pkt->off - last_buf_total;
> +				mrg_copy_bytes = min(buf[i].len - rxbuf_off, tmp_bytes);
> +				err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, buf[i].buf + rxbuf_off, mrg_copy_bytes);
> +				if (err)
> +					goto out;
> +
> +				tmp_bytes -= mrg_copy_bytes;
> +				pkt->off += mrg_copy_bytes;
> +				last_buf_total += buf[i].len;
> +				if (!tmp_bytes)
> +					break;
> +			}


After switch to use iov, you can user iov_iter helper to avoid the above 
open-coding I believe.

And you can also drop the if (mergeable) condition.

Thanks


> +
> +			if (tmp_bytes) {
> +				printk(KERN_WARNING "WARNING! bytes = %llu, "
> +						"bytes = %llu\n",
> +						(unsigned long long)bytes,
> +						(unsigned long long)tmp_bytes);
> +			}
> +
> +			total += (bytes - tmp_bytes);
> +		} else {
> +			err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, pkt->buf + pkt->off, bytes);
> +			if (err)
> +				goto out;
> +
> +			total += bytes;
> +			pkt->off += bytes;
> +		}
>
>   		spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> -
> -		total += bytes;
> -		pkt->off += bytes;
>   		if (pkt->off == pkt->len) {
>   			virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt);
>   			list_del(&pkt->list);
> @@ -1050,8 +1085,16 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
>
>   void virtio_transport_free_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
>   {
> -	kfree(pkt->buf);
> -	kfree(pkt);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (pkt->mergeable) {
> +		for (i = 1; i < le16_to_cpu(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr.num_buffers); i++)
> +			free_page((unsigned long)pkt->mrg_rxbuf[i].buf);
> +		free_page((unsigned long)(void *)pkt);
> +	} else {
> +		kfree(pkt->buf);
> +		kfree(pkt);
> +	}
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_free_pkt);
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ