[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVvczgezcWQ0awFUuj6gH-qeK05CXx=+AYcsxz_wkH1jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:22:04 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ip: fix csum_sub() with csum_block_sub()
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:17 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:04 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > When subtracting the checksum of a block of data,
> > csum_block_sub() must be used to respect the offset.
> >
> > We learned this lesson from both commit d55bef5059dd
> > ("net: fix pskb_trim_rcsum_slow() with odd trim offset") and
> > commit d48051c5b837 ("net/mlx5e: fix csum adjustments caused by RXFCS").
> >
> > Fixes: ca4ef4574f1e ("ip: fix IP_CHECKSUM handling")
>
> I do not believe you fix any bug here...
>
> I do not know of any inet protocol having odd header sizes.
That offset is payload offset, but yeah, the payload offset must be
aligned some way. Good point!
Let's drop it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists