[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1f25878c0b0b7d1f7f19a949376091e0b076d45.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 15:33:10 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mlichvar@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] More accurate PHC<->system clock
synchronization
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:28 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:14:41 +0100
>
> > RFC->v1:
> > - added new patches
> > - separated PHC timestamp from ptp_system_timestamp
> > - fixed memory leak in PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED
> > - changed PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED to work with array of arrays
> > - fixed PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED to break correctly from loop
> > - fixed timecounter updates in drivers
> > - split gettimex in igb driver
> > - fixed ptp_read_* functions to be available without
> > CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK
> >
> > This series enables a more accurate synchronization between PTP
> > hardware
> > clocks and the system clock.
> ...
>
> This series looks good to me but I want to give Richard an opportunity to
> review it first.
Dave, I also do not want to hold this series up by picking up patches 5, 6
and 7 (Intel drivers) so please apply the entire series after Richard
provides his review.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists