netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] More accurate PHC<->system clock synchronization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181109.165556.1136953476399358042.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 09 Nov 2018 16:55:56 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:     mlichvar@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        richardcochran@...il.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
        mtosatti@...hat.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] More accurate PHC<->system clock
 synchronization

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 15:33:10 -0800

> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:28 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
>> Date: Fri,  9 Nov 2018 11:14:41 +0100
>> 
>> > RFC->v1:
>> > - added new patches
>> > - separated PHC timestamp from ptp_system_timestamp
>> > - fixed memory leak in PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED
>> > - changed PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED to work with array of arrays
>> > - fixed PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED to break correctly from loop
>> > - fixed timecounter updates in drivers
>> > - split gettimex in igb driver
>> > - fixed ptp_read_* functions to be available without
>> >   CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK
>> > 
>> > This series enables a more accurate synchronization between PTP
>> > hardware
>> > clocks and the system clock.
>>  ...
>> 
>> This series looks good to me but I want to give Richard an opportunity to
>> review it first.
> 
> Dave, I also do not want to hold this series up by picking up patches 5, 6
> and 7 (Intel drivers) so please apply the entire series after Richard
> provides his review.

Ok, will do.