[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181113054950.77898-7-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:49:13 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 07/44] bpf: fix partial copy of map_ptr when dst is scalar
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
[ Upstream commit 0962590e553331db2cc0aef2dc35c57f6300dbbe ]
ALU operations on pointers such as scalar_reg += map_value_ptr are
handled in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Problem is however that map_ptr
and range in the register state share a union, so transferring state
through dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range is just buggy as any new
map_ptr in the dst_reg is then truncated (or null) for subsequent
checks. Fix this by adding a raw member and use it for copying state
over to dst_reg.
Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 3 +++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 38b04f559ad3..1fd6fa822d2c 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ struct bpf_reg_state {
* PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
*/
struct bpf_map *map_ptr;
+
+ /* Max size from any of the above. */
+ unsigned long raw;
};
/* Fixed part of pointer offset, pointer types only */
s32 off;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 465952a8e465..b046564cc18d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2762,7 +2762,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr;
dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off;
dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off + smin_val;
- dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range;
+ dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw;
break;
}
/* A new variable offset is created. Note that off_reg->off
@@ -2792,10 +2792,11 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off);
dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off;
+ dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw;
if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(ptr_reg)) {
dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
/* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */
- dst_reg->range = 0;
+ dst_reg->raw = 0;
}
break;
case BPF_SUB:
@@ -2824,7 +2825,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off;
dst_reg->id = ptr_reg->id;
dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off - smin_val;
- dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range;
+ dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw;
break;
}
/* A new variable offset is created. If the subtrahend is known
@@ -2850,11 +2851,12 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
dst_reg->var_off = tnum_sub(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off);
dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off;
+ dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw;
if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(ptr_reg)) {
dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
/* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */
if (smin_val < 0)
- dst_reg->range = 0;
+ dst_reg->raw = 0;
}
break;
case BPF_AND:
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists