lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB36009CD578B9CDBF4449130FFFC30@VI1PR0402MB3600.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 03:28:07 +0000
From:   Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Use standard SKB list accessors in
 brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw.

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Sent: 2018年11月11日 8:34
> [ As I am trying to remove direct SKB list pointer accesses I am
>   committing this to net-next.  If this causes a lot of grief I
>   can and will revert, just let me know. ]
> 
> Instead of direct SKB list pointer accesses.
> 
> The loops in this function had to be rewritten to accommodate this more
> easily.
> 
> The first loop iterates now over the target list in the outer loop, and triggers
> an mmc data operation when the per-operation limits are hit.
> 
> Then after the loops, if we have any residue, we trigger the last and final
> operation.
> 
> For the page aligned workaround, where we have to copy the read data back
> into the original list of SKBs, we use a two-tiered loop.  The outer loop stays
> the same and iterates over pktlist, and then we have an inner loop which uses
> skb_peek_next().  The break logic has been simplified because we know that
> the aggregate length of the SKBs in the source and destination lists are the
> same.
> 
> This change also ends up fixing a bug, having to do with the maintainance of
> the seg_sz variable and how it drove the outermost loop.  It begins as:
> 
> 	seg_sz = target_list->qlen;
> 
> ie. the number of packets in the target_list queue.  The loop structure was
> then:
> 
> 	while (seq_sz) {
> 		...
> 		while (not at end of target_list) {
> 			...
> 			sg_cnt++
> 			...
> 		}
> 		...
> 		seg_sz -= sg_cnt;
> 
> The assumption built into that last statement is that sg_cnt counts how many
> packets from target_list have been fully processed by the inner loop.  But
> this not true.
> 
> If we hit one of the limits, such as the max segment size or the max request
> size, we will break and copy a partial packet then contine back up to the top
> of the outermost loop.
> 
> With the new loops we don't have this problem as we don't guard the loop
> exit with a packet count, but instead use the progression of the pkt_next SKB
> through the list to the end.  The general structure is:
> 
> 	sg_cnt = 0;
> 	skb_queue_walk(target_list, pkt_next) {
> 		pkt_offset = 0;
> 		...
> 		sg_cnt++;
> 		...
> 		while (pkt_offset < pkt_next->len) {
> 			pkt_offset += sg_data_size;
> 			if (queued up max per request)
> 				mmc_submit_one();
> 		}
> 	}
> 	if (sg_cnt)
> 		mmc_submit_one();
> 
> The variables that maintain where we are in the MMC command state such
> as req_sz, sg_cnt, and sgl are reset when we emit one of these full sized
> requests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c      | 137
> ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index 3e37c8cf82c6..b2ad2122c8c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,37 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_skbuff_write(struct
> brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
>  	return err;
>  }
> 
> +static int mmc_submit_one(struct mmc_data *md, struct mmc_request *mr,
> +			  struct mmc_command *mc, int sg_cnt, int req_sz,
> +			  int func_blk_sz, u32 *addr,
> +			  struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
> +			  struct sdio_func *func, int write) {
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	md->sg_len = sg_cnt;
> +	md->blocks = req_sz / func_blk_sz;
> +	mc->arg |= (*addr & 0x1FFFF) << 9;	/* address */
> +	mc->arg |= md->blocks & 0x1FF;	/* block count */
> +	/* incrementing addr for function 1 */
> +	if (func->num == 1)
> +		*addr += req_sz;
> +
> +	mmc_set_data_timeout(md, func->card);
> +	mmc_wait_for_req(func->card->host, mr);
> +
> +	ret = mc->error ? mc->error : md->error;
> +	if (ret == -ENOMEDIUM) {
> +		brcmf_sdiod_change_state(sdiodev, BRCMF_SDIOD_NOMEDIUM);
> +	} else if (ret != 0) {
> +		brcmf_err("CMD53 sg block %s failed %d\n",
> +			  write ? "write" : "read", ret);
> +		ret = -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw - SDIO interface function for block data access
>   * @sdiodev: brcmfmac sdio device
> @@ -360,11 +391,11 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw(struct
> brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
>  				 struct sk_buff_head *pktlist)
>  {
>  	unsigned int req_sz, func_blk_sz, sg_cnt, sg_data_sz, pkt_offset;
> -	unsigned int max_req_sz, orig_offset, dst_offset;
> -	unsigned short max_seg_cnt, seg_sz;
> +	unsigned int max_req_sz, src_offset, dst_offset;
>  	unsigned char *pkt_data, *orig_data, *dst_data;
> -	struct sk_buff *pkt_next = NULL, *local_pkt_next;
>  	struct sk_buff_head local_list, *target_list;
> +	struct sk_buff *pkt_next = NULL, *src;
> +	unsigned short max_seg_cnt;
>  	struct mmc_request mmc_req;
>  	struct mmc_command mmc_cmd;
>  	struct mmc_data mmc_dat;
> @@ -404,9 +435,6 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw(struct
> brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
>  	max_req_sz = sdiodev->max_request_size;
>  	max_seg_cnt = min_t(unsigned short, sdiodev->max_segment_count,
>  			    target_list->qlen);
> -	seg_sz = target_list->qlen;
> -	pkt_offset = 0;
> -	pkt_next = target_list->next;
> 
>  	memset(&mmc_req, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_request));
>  	memset(&mmc_cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command)); @@ -425,12
> +453,12 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw(struct brcmf_sdio_dev
> *sdiodev,
>  	mmc_req.cmd = &mmc_cmd;
>  	mmc_req.data = &mmc_dat;
> 
> -	while (seg_sz) {
> -		req_sz = 0;
> -		sg_cnt = 0;
> -		sgl = sdiodev->sgtable.sgl;
> -		/* prep sg table */
> -		while (pkt_next != (struct sk_buff *)target_list) {
> +	req_sz = 0;
> +	sg_cnt = 0;
> +	sgl = sdiodev->sgtable.sgl;
> +	skb_queue_walk(target_list, pkt_next) {
> +		pkt_offset = 0;
> +		while (pkt_offset < pkt_next->len) {
>  			pkt_data = pkt_next->data + pkt_offset;
>  			sg_data_sz = pkt_next->len - pkt_offset;
>  			if (sg_data_sz > sdiodev->max_segment_size) @@ -439,72
> +467,55 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw(struct brcmf_sdio_dev
> *sdiodev,
>  				sg_data_sz = max_req_sz - req_sz;
> 
>  			sg_set_buf(sgl, pkt_data, sg_data_sz);
> -
>  			sg_cnt++;
> +
>  			sgl = sg_next(sgl);
>  			req_sz += sg_data_sz;
>  			pkt_offset += sg_data_sz;
> -			if (pkt_offset == pkt_next->len) {
> -				pkt_offset = 0;
> -				pkt_next = pkt_next->next;
> +			if (req_sz >= max_req_sz || sg_cnt >= max_seg_cnt) {
> +				ret = mmc_submit_one(&mmc_dat, &mmc_req,
> &mmc_cmd,
> +						     sg_cnt, req_sz, func_blk_sz,
> +						     &addr, sdiodev, func, write);
> +				if (ret)
> +					goto exit_queue_walk;
> +				req_sz = 0;
> +				sg_cnt = 0;
> +				sgl = sdiodev->sgtable.sgl;
>  			}
> -
> -			if (req_sz >= max_req_sz || sg_cnt >= max_seg_cnt)
> -				break;
> -		}
> -		seg_sz -= sg_cnt;
> -
> -		if (req_sz % func_blk_sz != 0) {
> -			brcmf_err("sg request length %u is not %u aligned\n",
> -				  req_sz, func_blk_sz);
> -			ret = -ENOTBLK;
> -			goto exit;
> -		}
> -
> -		mmc_dat.sg_len = sg_cnt;
> -		mmc_dat.blocks = req_sz / func_blk_sz;
> -		mmc_cmd.arg |= (addr & 0x1FFFF) << 9;	/* address */
> -		mmc_cmd.arg |= mmc_dat.blocks & 0x1FF;	/* block count */
> -		/* incrementing addr for function 1 */
> -		if (func->num == 1)
> -			addr += req_sz;
> -
> -		mmc_set_data_timeout(&mmc_dat, func->card);
> -		mmc_wait_for_req(func->card->host, &mmc_req);
> -
> -		ret = mmc_cmd.error ? mmc_cmd.error : mmc_dat.error;
> -		if (ret == -ENOMEDIUM) {
> -			brcmf_sdiod_change_state(sdiodev,
> BRCMF_SDIOD_NOMEDIUM);
> -			break;
> -		} else if (ret != 0) {
> -			brcmf_err("CMD53 sg block %s failed %d\n",
> -				  write ? "write" : "read", ret);
> -			ret = -EIO;
> -			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> -
> +	if (sg_cnt)
> +		ret = mmc_submit_one(&mmc_dat, &mmc_req, &mmc_cmd,
> +				     sg_cnt, req_sz, func_blk_sz,
> +				     &addr, sdiodev, func, write);
> +exit_queue_walk:
>  	if (!write && sdiodev->settings->bus.sdio.broken_sg_support) {
> -		local_pkt_next = local_list.next;
> -		orig_offset = 0;
> +		src = __skb_peek(&local_list);
> +		src_offset = 0;
>  		skb_queue_walk(pktlist, pkt_next) {
>  			dst_offset = 0;
> -			do {
> -				req_sz = local_pkt_next->len - orig_offset;
> -				req_sz = min_t(uint, pkt_next->len - dst_offset,
> -					       req_sz);
> -				orig_data = local_pkt_next->data + orig_offset;
> +
> +			/* This is safe because we must have enough SKB data
> +			 * in the local list to cover everything in pktlist.
> +			 */
> +			while (1) {
> +				req_sz = pkt_next->len - dst_offset;
> +				if (req_sz > src->len - src_offset)
> +					req_sz = src->len - src_offset;
> +
> +				orig_data = src->data + src_offset;
>  				dst_data = pkt_next->data + dst_offset;
>  				memcpy(dst_data, orig_data, req_sz);
> -				orig_offset += req_sz;
> -				dst_offset += req_sz;
> -				if (orig_offset == local_pkt_next->len) {
> -					orig_offset = 0;
> -					local_pkt_next = local_pkt_next->next;
> +
> +				src_offset += req_sz;
> +				if (src_offset == src->len) {
> +					src_offset = 0;
> +					src = skb_peek_next(src, &local_list);
>  				}
> +				dst_offset += req_sz;
>  				if (dst_offset == pkt_next->len)
>  					break;
> -			} while (!skb_queue_empty(&local_list));
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.19.1

I just have bcm4339 in hands, test the patch on i.MX7D sdb board with bcm4339, it works fine with iperf testing.

Tested-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ