lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOftzPjoAadwrYzhMY_P36D+ZpKAzYBAFth=S3LyGrqKGy9e2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:36:26 -0800
From:   Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: netns_id in bpf_sk_lookup_{tcp,udp}

Hi David, thanks for pointing this out.

This is more of an oversight through iterations, the runtime lookup
will fail to find a socket if the netns value is greater than the
range of a uint32 so I think it would actually make more sense to drop
the parameter size to u32 rather than u64 so that this would be
validated at load time rather than silently returning NULL because of
a bad parameter.

I'll send a patch to bpf tree.

Cheers,
Joe

On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 19:27, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Joe:
>
> The netns_id to the bpf_sk_lookup_{tcp,udp} functions in
> net/core/filter.c is a u64, yet the APIs in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> shows a u32. Is that intentional or an oversight through the iterations?
>
> David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ