[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181119203046.GA7067@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:30:46 +0100
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/bpf: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling
from VLAN_TCI
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:26:46PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/10/2018 07:58 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
>
> Why you have empty commit messages for non-trivial changes like this in
> 4 out of 6 of your patches ...
>
> How was it tested on the JITs you were changing? Did you test on both,
> big and little endian machines?
I have only x86 boxes currently so didn't try to test others. I hope
upstreaming the series through net-next will allow us to find any
fallouts, if any. The changes are very simple, though: they move
code around (the "splitting" part) and eventually change a vlan_present
flag's position in a skbuff structure. Dependency on CPU endianness is
removed by using byte loads for the flag.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
Powered by blists - more mailing lists