[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c420b7a8-73df-3e9c-962a-a295ad0a6139@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:26:46 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/bpf: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling
from VLAN_TCI
On 11/10/2018 07:58 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Why you have empty commit messages for non-trivial changes like this in
4 out of 6 of your patches ...
How was it tested on the JITs you were changing? Did you test on both,
big and little endian machines?
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index e521c5ebc7d1..c151b906df53 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -296,22 +296,21 @@ static u32 convert_skb_access(int skb_field, int dst_reg, int src_reg,
> break;
>
> case SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG:
> - case SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT:
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, vlan_tci) != 2);
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(VLAN_TAG_PRESENT != 0x1000);
>
> /* dst_reg = *(u16 *) (src_reg + offsetof(vlan_tci)) */
> *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, dst_reg, src_reg,
> offsetof(struct sk_buff, vlan_tci));
> - if (skb_field == SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG) {
> - *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, dst_reg,
> - ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> - } else {
> - /* dst_reg >>= 12 */
> - *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, dst_reg, 12);
> - /* dst_reg &= 1 */
> +#ifdef VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
> + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, dst_reg, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> +#endif
> + break;
> + case SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT:
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, dst_reg, src_reg, PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_OFFSET());
> + if (PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_BIT)
> + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, dst_reg, PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_BIT);
> + if (PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_BIT < 7)
> *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, dst_reg, 1);
> - }
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -6140,19 +6139,22 @@ static u32 bpf_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
> break;
>
> case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, vlan_present):
> + *target_size = 1;
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
> + PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_OFFSET());
> + if (PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_BIT)
> + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, si->dst_reg, PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_BIT);
> + if (PKT_VLAN_PRESENT_BIT < 7)
> + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, si->dst_reg, 1);
> + break;
> +
> case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, vlan_tci):
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(VLAN_TAG_PRESENT != 0x1000);
> -
> *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
> bpf_target_off(struct sk_buff, vlan_tci, 2,
> target_size));
> - if (si->off == offsetof(struct __sk_buff, vlan_tci)) {
> - *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, si->dst_reg,
> - ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> - } else {
> - *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, si->dst_reg, 12);
> - *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, si->dst_reg, 1);
> - }
> +#ifdef VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
> + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, si->dst_reg, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT);
> +#endif
> break;
>
> case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) ...
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists