[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181121085024.GD2264@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:50:24 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v3 2/2] man: tc-flower: Add explanation for
range option
Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 05:59:45AM CET, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
>> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
>> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword?
>
>I think so. Consistency across commands is a good thing.
+1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists