netdev - Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v3 2/2] man: tc-flower: Add explanation for range option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d387af2-1b73-435b-d4ac-6b1969f2bd66@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:16:19 -0800
From:   "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
        jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v3 2/2] man: tc-flower: Add explanation for
 range option

On 11/20/2018 8:59 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
>> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
>> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword?
> 
> I think so. Consistency across commands is a good thing.
> 

Okay, will do. I'll also combine the 'man patch' into 'flower patch' and
make a single patch as Jiri recommended.