[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8426219f-7024-1030-01ce-8daecbaa097b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:59:45 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v3 2/2] man: tc-flower: Add explanation for
range option
On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword?
I think so. Consistency across commands is a good thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists