netdev - Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v4] tc: flower: Classify packets based port ranges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181126200254.0a213bbd@xeon-e3>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:02:54 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
        jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v4] tc: flower: Classify packets based
 port ranges

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:56:10 -0800
"Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com> wrote:

> On 11/26/2018 4:43 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 11/26/18 5:23 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:  
> >>> Can tc flower use something similar to ip ru with single port or port
> >>> range handled like this?
> >>>
> >>>     },{
> >>>         "priority": 32764,
> >>>         "src": "172.16.1.0",
> >>>         "srclen": 24,
> >>>         "ipproto": "tcp",
> >>>         "sport": 1100,
> >>>         "table": "main"
> >>>     },{
> >>>         "priority": 32765,
> >>>         "src": "172.16.1.0",
> >>>         "srclen": 24,
> >>>         "ipproto": "tcp",
> >>>         "sport_start": 1000,
> >>>         "sport_end": 1010,
> >>>         "table": "main"
> >>>     },{
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>
> >> Does it have to be separate fields "sport_start" and "sport_end"?
> >> Removing the space and 'range' keyword will make the output format
> >> consistent with the input format and print as "sport <number>" for
> >> single port and "sport <start>-<end>" for range.
> >> Example:
> >>
> >> ... flower ip_proto tcp src_port 12 skip_hw action will print as:
> >>   ip_proto tcp
> >>   src_port 12
> >>   skip_hw
> >>   not_in_hw
> >>         action
> >>
> >> ... flower ip_proto tcp src_port 100-200 skip_hw action :
> >>   ip_proto tcp
> >>   src_port 100-200
> >>   skip_hw
> >>   not_in_hw
> >>         action  
> > 
> > non-json output needs to match what the user gives on the command line.
> > 
> > My comment was about consistency with json output when possible. I am
> > not a json expert by any means. Other commands have a single key value
> > pair, so I suspect the json here needs to follow suit (ie., not
> > "src_port": "1000-1010" but separate start and end entries).
> >   
> I'm not quite familiar with json. Maybe, Jiri can give feedback here.

JSON support strings and numeric and objects.
The more common JSON way of expressing this would be either as object for sport

{
       "priority": 32765,
       "src": "172.16.1.0",
        "srclen": 24,
       "ipproto": "tcp",
	"sport" : {
		"start" : 1000,
		"end" : 1010
	},
	"table: "main"
}

or as an array:
{
       "priority": 32765,
       "src": "172.16.1.0",
        "srclen": 24,
       "ipproto": "tcp",
	"sport" : [ 1000, 1010 ],
	"table: "main"
}

My point is don't build some semantic meaning directly into the tag part of the syntax.