netdev - Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181128.110200.1264664274998624358.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:02:00 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:34:55 +0100

> Yeah fully agree. Thinking diff below should address it, do you
> have a chance to give this a spin for sparc / 32 bit to check if
> test_verifier still explodes?

Great, let me play with this.

I did something simpler yesterday, just changing the data pointers to
"u64" and that made at least one test pass that didn't before :-)

I'll get back to you with results.