netdev - Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181130233307.kue2so72mga6z6qg@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:33:08 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:02:00AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:34:55 +0100
> 
> > Yeah fully agree. Thinking diff below should address it, do you
> > have a chance to give this a spin for sparc / 32 bit to check if
> > test_verifier still explodes?
> 
> Great, let me play with this.
> 
> I did something simpler yesterday, just changing the data pointers to
> "u64" and that made at least one test pass that didn't before :-)
> 
> I'll get back to you with results.

Did you have a chance to test it ?

I'd like to add a tested-by before I apply Daniel's patch
which looks good to me. btw.