netdev - Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee2b08e3-1570-7927-5c97-98856fb4f771@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Sat, 1 Dec 2018 00:53:32 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

On 12/01/2018 12:33 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:02:00AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:34:55 +0100
>>
>>> Yeah fully agree. Thinking diff below should address it, do you
>>> have a chance to give this a spin for sparc / 32 bit to check if
>>> test_verifier still explodes?
>>
>> Great, let me play with this.
>>
>> I did something simpler yesterday, just changing the data pointers to
>> "u64" and that made at least one test pass that didn't before :-)
>>
>> I'll get back to you with results.
> 
> Did you have a chance to test it ?

David got back to me and mentioned it worked fine on sparc.

> I'd like to add a tested-by before I apply Daniel's patch
> which looks good to me. btw.

Yeah, wanted to cook an official patch today, let me do that now.