netdev - Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181130.165847.730597502210140882.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:58:47 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit

From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:33:08 -0800

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:02:00AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:34:55 +0100
>> 
>> > Yeah fully agree. Thinking diff below should address it, do you
>> > have a chance to give this a spin for sparc / 32 bit to check if
>> > test_verifier still explodes?
>> 
>> Great, let me play with this.
>> 
>> I did something simpler yesterday, just changing the data pointers to
>> "u64" and that made at least one test pass that didn't before :-)
>> 
>> I'll get back to you with results.
> 
> Did you have a chance to test it ?
> 
> I'd like to add a tested-by before I apply Daniel's patch
> which looks good to me. btw.

Tested-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

Yes, it does the trick.