[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181128.223353.2055105884409015831.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 22:33:53 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: daniel@...earbox.net
CC: ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.
The message got changed a lot time ago.
This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64.
Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 550b7e46bf4a..5dd4410a716c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -14230,7 +14230,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
- strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
+ strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
if (reject_from_alignment) {
printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists