Message-ID: <751abb25-e769-beec-5720-a95991228921@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 23:41:16 +1000
From:   Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>
To:     Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc:     sean.wang@...iatek.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, blogic@...nwrt.org, neil@...wn.name,
        René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: net: dsa: mt7530: support MT7530 in the MT7621 SoC

Hi Bjorn,

On 30/11/18 10:16 pm, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> gerg@...nel.org writes:
> 
>> I have been working towards supporting the MT7530 switch as used in the
>> MediaTek MT7621 SoC. Unlike the MediaTek MT7623 the MT7621 is built around
>> a dual core MIPS CPU architecture. But underneath it is what appears to
>> be the same 7530 switch.
> 
> Great!  Good to see someone pushing this idea forward.
> 
>> The following 3 patches are more of an RFC than anything. They allow
>> use of the mt7530 dsa driver on this device - though with some issues
>> still to resolve. The primary change required is to not use the 7623
>> specific clock and regulator setup - none of that applies when using
>> the 7621 (and maybe other devices?). The other change required is to
>> set the 7530 MFC register CPU port number and enable bit.
>>
>> The unresolved issues I still have appear to be more related to the
>> MT7621 ethernet driver (drivers/staging/mt7621-eth/*). I am hoping
>> someone might have some ideas on these. I don't really have any good
>> documentation on the ethernet devices on the 7621, so I am kind of
>> working in the dark here.
> 
> No offense, but the mt7621-eth driver in staging is horrible.  What both
> René and I have had some success with is adapting the mtk_eth_soc driver
> already in drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/.  Yes, I know this is supposed
> to be for other SoCs, but the basic design is obviously the same.

Yes, that makes a lot of sense. I have only been working with the
linux mainline mt7621 staging driver so far for this mt7530 work.
(I started trying to make this work with linux 4.19).


> I have had some success with a first hackish attemt based on OpenWrt.
> You can find the early tree here, but note that my focus was basically
> getting one specific MT7621 board up and running:
> https://github.com/bmork/LEDE/tree/mt7621-with-mainline-eth-driver

Thats great, thanks for the pointer, I'll have a close look at that.


> This patch has most of the necessary changes to enable that driver for
> MT7621:
> https://github.com/bmork/LEDE/commit/3293bc63f5461ca1eb0bbc4ed90145335e7e3404
> 
> Not a big deal, as you can see.  There is of course a reason I didn't
> submit this here yet: It is by no means finished...  But it works. And I
> have both GMACs working with this driver, which was my primary goal.
> 
>> 1. TX packets are not getting an IP header checksum via the normal
>>     off-loaded checksumming when in DSA mode. I have to switch off
>>     NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, so the software stack generates the checksum.
>>     That checksum offloading works ok when not using the 7530 DSA driver.
> 
> Hmm.  How do I test this?

For me every transmitted packet had the wrong IP header checksum.
Every packet I received at the other end of the wire (dumped with
tcpdump) showed up with wrong header checksum. I am guessing you didn't
see this behavior - you can't really miss it :-)


>> 2. Maximal sized RX packets get silently dropped. So receive side packets
>>     that are large (perfect case is the all-but-last packets in a fragemented
>>     larger packet) appear to be dropped at the mt7621 ethernet MAC level.
>>     The 7530 MIB switch register counters show receive packets at the physical
>>     switch port side and at the CPU switch port - but I get no packets
>>     received or errors in the 7621 ethernet MAC. If I set the mtu of the
>>     server at the other end a little smaller (a few bytes is enough) then
>>     I get all the packets through. It seems like the DSA/VLAN tag bytes
>>     are causing a too large packet to get silently dropped somewhere.
> 
> Are you referring to the configured MTU size or some other maximal size?
> If MTU, then I don't seem to have this issue with the driver from
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/.

I was referring to the mtu on the system at the other end of the wire.
For me that was my development PC (just a xubuntu 18.04, x86 machine).
If I reduced it there from the default mtu of 1500 I could get packets
to be received on the mt7621. The behavior was obvious to see with large
sent packets (something simple like ping -s 2000), the first fragment was
silently dropped bu the second fragment would get through.

Anyway, I will try out the changes you have for the drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek
driver, they sound very promising.

Thanks
Greg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists