[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181130160553.9739-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:05:53 +0000
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: [PATCH v2] vhost: fix IOTLB locking
Commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one") moved the vq
lock to improve scalability, but introduced a possible deadlock in
vhost-iotlb. vhost_iotlb_notify_vq() now takes vq->mutex while holding
the device's IOTLB spinlock. And on the vhost_iotlb_miss() path, the
spinlock is taken while holding vq->mutex.
Since calling vhost_poll_queue() doesn't require any lock, avoid the
deadlock by not taking vq->mutex.
Fixes: 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one")
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 3a5f81a66d34..6b98d8e3a5bf 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -944,10 +944,7 @@ static void vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(struct vhost_dev *d,
if (msg->iova <= vq_msg->iova &&
msg->iova + msg->size - 1 >= vq_msg->iova &&
vq_msg->type == VHOST_IOTLB_MISS) {
- mutex_lock(&node->vq->mutex);
vhost_poll_queue(&node->vq->poll);
- mutex_unlock(&node->vq->mutex);
-
list_del(&node->node);
kfree(node);
}
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists