netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181130.134703.1703684498402097596.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:47:03 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, dave@...olabs.net, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amir73il@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        dja@...ens.net, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        federico.vaga@...a.pv.it, geert+renesas@...der.be, deller@....de,
        corbet@....net, kumba@...too.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, paul.burton@...s.com, pmladek@...e.com,
        robh@...nel.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, shannon.nelson@...cle.com,
        sbrivio@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, me@...in.cc,
        makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp, willemb@...gle.com, yhs@...com,
        yanjun.zhu@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:42:33 -0800

> Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then?

Regardless of what I think, as others have showen the CoC explicitly
does not apply to existing code.