netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:48:08 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, dave@...olabs.net,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        amir73il@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, dja@...ens.net,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, federico.vaga@...a.pv.it,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, deller@....de, corbet@....net,
        kumba@...too.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, paul.burton@...s.com, pmladek@...e.com,
        robh@...nel.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, shannon.nelson@...cle.com,
        sbrivio@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, me@...in.cc,
        makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp, willemb@...gle.com, yhs@...com,
        yanjun.zhu@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800

> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't
>> necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading.  Our most heavily censored
>> medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain
>> contexts on most channels in the UK and EU.
> 
> This makes following the CoC extremely hard to a non-native speaker as
> it is not too explicit on what is OK and what is not. I did through the
> whole thing with an eye glass and this what I deduced from it.

It would be helpful if you could explain what part of the language
is unclear wrt. explaining how CoC does not apply to existing code.

That part seems very explicit to me.