[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca9d778bc0466f41c0852ba02666439d815ae44f.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 23:58:18 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 7/7] net/mlx5e: Improve ethtool private-flags code
structure
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 11:28 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> Hello, Saeed
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:27 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> wrote:
> > static int mlx5e_handle_pflag(struct net_device *netdev,
> > u32 wanted_flags,
> > - enum mlx5e_priv_flag flag,
> > - mlx5e_pflag_handler pflag_handler)
> > + enum mlx5e_priv_flag flag)
> > {
> ...
> > if (err) {
> > netdev_err(netdev, "%s private flag 0x%x failed err
> > %d\n",
> > enable ? "Enable" : "Disable", flag,
> > err);
>
> As flag is now a true enum, you probably don't want to print it out
> as hex
> any more.
>
Good point, i guess we can print mlx5e_priv_flags[flag].name
thank you Cong !
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists