lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ab35f56-cb8e-ddbc-ce8a-148a943dec92@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:01:35 +0200
From:   Risto Pajula <or.pajula@...il.com>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IP (rtl8169) forwarding bug (performance)

Hello.

A freshly built 4.20.0-rc6-next-20181210-lp150.12.25-default waited me 
when I got back from work, but unfortunately it did not help at all, it 
behaved exactly in same manner.

Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=307ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

BR.
Risto


On 11.12.2018 0:20, Risto Pajula wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have not yet tested with linux-next but I will, thanks for pointing 
> that out.
>
> ...But I have studied the problem a bit more, indeed it seems that the 
> rtl8169 transmission queue gets stuck.
>
> Below is some trace log. Starting from 802026 a burst of frames is 
> forwarded from eth0 to eth1 and when we get to the rtl_tx only two 
> frames have been transmitted.. (Should have had 1,25 ms to transmit 
> them).. Also then the sequence seems to repeat for very long time that 
> only two massages get transmitted.
>
> 800541:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698143: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 34 
> cur_tx: 4406946 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406946 tx_left: 0
> 800671:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698189: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 35 
> cur_tx: 4406947 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406946 tx_left: 1
> 800835:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698235: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 36 
> cur_tx: 4406948 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406946 tx_left: 2
> 800905:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698255: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 37 cur_tx: 4406949 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406946 tx_left: 3
> 800932:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698263: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 37 cur_tx: 4406949 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406947 tx_left: 2
> 800960:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698270: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 37 cur_tx: 4406949 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406948 tx_left: 1
> 800998:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698282: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 37 
> cur_tx: 4406949 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406949 tx_left: 0
> 801085:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698312: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 38 cur_tx: 4406950 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406949 tx_left: 1
> 801137:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698329: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 38 
> cur_tx: 4406950 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406950 tx_left: 0
> 801229:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698363: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 39 cur_tx: 4406951 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406950 tx_left: 1
> 801264:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698375: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 39 
> cur_tx: 4406951 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406951 tx_left: 0
> 801356:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698409: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 40 cur_tx: 4406952 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406951 tx_left: 1
> 801391:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698421: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 40 
> cur_tx: 4406952 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406952 tx_left: 0
> 801482:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698455: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 41 cur_tx: 4406953 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406952 tx_left: 1
> 801518:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698468: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 41 
> cur_tx: 4406953 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406953 tx_left: 0
> 801610:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698502: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 42 cur_tx: 4406954 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406953 tx_left: 1
> 801645:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698514: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 42 
> cur_tx: 4406954 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406954 tx_left: 0
> 801737:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698548: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 43 cur_tx: 4406955 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406954 tx_left: 1
> 801772:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698560: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 43 
> cur_tx: 4406955 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406955 tx_left: 0
> 801864:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698594: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 44 cur_tx: 4406956 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406955 tx_left: 1
> 801899:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698607: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 44 
> cur_tx: 4406956 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406956 tx_left: 0
> 801984:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.698640: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 45 cur_tx: 4406957 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406956 tx_left: 1
> 802026:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698655: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 45 
> cur_tx: 4406957 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 0
> 802129:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698701: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 46 
> cur_tx: 4406958 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 1
> 802232:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698747: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 47 
> cur_tx: 4406959 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 2
> 802335:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698793: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 48 
> cur_tx: 4406960 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 3
> 802438:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698840: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 49 
> cur_tx: 4406961 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 4
> 802541:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698885: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 50 
> cur_tx: 4406962 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 5
> 802644:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698932: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 51 
> cur_tx: 4406963 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 6
> 802747:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.698978: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 52 
> cur_tx: 4406964 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 7
> 802851:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.699025: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 53 
> cur_tx: 4406965 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 8
> 805094:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.699871: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 54 cur_tx: 4406966 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406957 tx_left: 9
> 805126:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.699878: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 54 cur_tx: 4406966 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406958 tx_left: 8
> 805197:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.699905: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 54 
> cur_tx: 4406966 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406959 tx_left: 7
> 805234:          <idle>-0     [001] ..s.  7237.699925: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 55 
> cur_tx: 4406967 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406959 tx_left: 8
> 811446:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.702344: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 56 cur_tx: 4406968 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406959 tx_left: 9
> 811479:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.702354: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 56 cur_tx: 4406968 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406960 tx_left: 8
> 811641:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.702395: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 56 
> cur_tx: 4406968 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406961 tx_left: 7
> 811733:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.702416: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 57 
> cur_tx: 4406969 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406961 tx_left: 8
> 812050:          hping3-2871  [000] ..s.  7237.704770: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 58 cur_tx: 4406970 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406961 tx_left: 9
> 812061:          hping3-2871  [000] ..s.  7237.704777: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 58 cur_tx: 4406970 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406962 tx_left: 8
> 812124:          hping3-2871  [000] ..s.  7237.704811: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 58 
> cur_tx: 4406970 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406963 tx_left: 7
> 812176:          hping3-2871  [000] ..s.  7237.704831: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 59 
> cur_tx: 4406971 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406963 tx_left: 8
> 812300:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.707247: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 60 cur_tx: 4406972 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406963 tx_left: 9
> 812312:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.707257: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 60 cur_tx: 4406972 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406964 tx_left: 8
> 812389:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.707297: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 60 
> cur_tx: 4406972 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406965 tx_left: 7
> 812426:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.707318: 
> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 1506 entry: 61 
> cur_tx: 4406973 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 4406965 tx_left: 8
> 812827:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.709690: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 62 cur_tx: 4406974 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406965 tx_left: 9
> 812838:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  7237.709700: rtl8169_poll: 
> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 1506 entry: 62 cur_tx: 4406974 frags: 0 
> dirty_tx: 4406966 tx_left: 8
> .....
>
>
> BR.
> Risto
>
> On 10.12.2018 23:26, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Did you test also with the latest linux-next kernel? Some recent 
>> changes like 2e6eedb4813e
>> "r8169: make use of xmit_more and __netdev_sent_queue" may have a 
>> positive impact.
>>
>> On 10.12.2018 00:28, Risto Pajula wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Old subject: "Re: IP fragmentation performance and don't fragment 
>>> bug when forwarding
>>>
>>>
>>> I have now been tracing the kernel and finding the bug seems 
>>> difficult. I think the bug is combination of several things, likely 
>>> cause is that it only occurs with rtl8169 and how it is using the 
>>> netdevapi/DQL api.
>>>
>>>  From my investigations seems that following happens:
>>>
>>> *Burst of frames is received from internet. (eth0)
>>> *These are accepted and forwarded to the (eth1)
>>> *DQL hits the limit, this causes the scheduling for the device to be 
>>> stopped (__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF)
>>> *This and combination of some timing causes the  performance 
>>> degradation, messages are only scheduled for transmission in soft 
>>> Irq context.
>>>
>>> I still do now know, why the DQL hits the limits.. I think it should 
>>> not,  maybe something undesirable first happens with rtl8169.
>>>
>>> I inserted following trace printk functions to the code..
>>>
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit:
>>> trace_printk("ORP33 %s rtl8169_start_xmit len: %d entry: %u cur_tx: 
>>> %u frags: %d dirty_tx: %u tx_left: %u\n" , tp->dev->name, skb->len, 
>>> entry, tp->cur_tx, frags, tp->dirty_tx, (tp->cur_tx - tp->dirty_tx) );
>>>
>>>
>>> rtl_tx:
>>> trace_printk("ORP33 %s rtl_tx len: %d entry: %u cur_tx: %u frags: %d 
>>> dirty_tx: %u tx_left: %u\n" , tp->dev->name, tx_skb->skb->len, 
>>> tp->cur_tx % NUM_TX_DESC, tp->cur_tx, 0, dirty_tx, tx_left );
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is some grepped output only filtering the ping packet in two 
>>> different situations:
>>>
>>> //trace when downloading ubuntu (~20MB/s), only 3 secs fit to 
>>> buffer. ping is all the time normal....
>>> //orig tracing.out3754
>>> 117493:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  5235.407116: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 57 cur_tx: 3747641 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 3747640 tx_left: 1
>>> 118704:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  5235.416057: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 20 cur_tx: 3747668 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 3747667 tx_left: 1
>>> 346319:          hping3-2871  [000] ....  5236.002456: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 8 
>>> cur_tx: 3754312 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 3754312 tx_left: 0
>>> 346337:          hping3-2871  [000] ..s.  5236.002475: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 9 cur_tx: 3754313 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 3754312 tx_left: 1
>>> 1277155:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  5237.002627: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 38 
>>> cur_tx: 3766502 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 3766502 tx_left: 0
>>> 1277173:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  5237.002646: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 39 cur_tx: 3766503 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 3766502 tx_left: 1
>>>
>>>
>>> //imcp messages from route to intenal network when TCP stream is on. 
>>> tracing.out3236/eth1_ring.txt is the original
>>> //no idea why the first frame is tripled...
>>> 200792:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  3239.593384: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 34 
>>> cur_tx: 2132770 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2132770 tx_left: 0
>>> 201578:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  3240.593625: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 40 
>>> cur_tx: 2132776 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2132776 tx_left: 0
>>> 341061:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3241.738011: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 52 
>>> cur_tx: 2133684 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2133680 tx_left: 4
>>> 342112:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3241.745297: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 59 cur_tx: 2133691 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 2133684 tx_left: 7
>>> 500126:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3242.739500: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 49 
>>> cur_tx: 2134513 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2134505 tx_left: 8
>>> 501739:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3242.751654: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 58 cur_tx: 2134522 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 2134513 tx_left: 9
>>> 646220:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3243.745761: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 41 
>>> cur_tx: 2135273 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2135267 tx_left: 6
>>> 647633:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3243.755486: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 49 cur_tx: 2135281 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 2135273 tx_left: 8
>>> 802878:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3244.739947: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 23 
>>> cur_tx: 2136087 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2136081 tx_left: 6
>>> 804298:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3244.749677: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 31 cur_tx: 2136095 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 2136087 tx_left: 8
>>> 961190:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3245.746217: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 16 
>>> cur_tx: 2136912 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2136906 tx_left: 6
>>> 962610:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3245.755946: rtl8169_poll: 
>>> ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 24 cur_tx: 2136920 frags: 0 
>>> dirty_tx: 2136912 tx_left: 8
>>> 1118044:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3246.740336: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 62 
>>> cur_tx: 2137726 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2137720 tx_left: 6
>>> 1119443:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3246.750047: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 5 cur_tx: 2137733 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2137726 tx_left: 7
>>> 1264047:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3247.709202: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 29 
>>> cur_tx: 2138525 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2138518 tx_left: 7
>>> 1264740:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3247.718918: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 33 cur_tx: 2138529 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2138525 tx_left: 4
>>> 1419958:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3248.736436: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 48 
>>> cur_tx: 2139312 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2139305 tx_left: 7
>>> 1421551:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3248.746189: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 56 cur_tx: 2139320 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2139312 tx_left: 8
>>> 1578746:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3249.742702: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 46 
>>> cur_tx: 2140142 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2140135 tx_left: 7
>>> 1580194:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3249.752457: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 54 cur_tx: 2140150 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2140142 tx_left: 8
>>> 1729597:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3250.746839: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 36 
>>> cur_tx: 2140964 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2140957 tx_left: 7
>>> 1731015:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3250.756594: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 43 cur_tx: 2140971 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2140964 tx_left: 7
>>> 1881028:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3251.740991: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 19 
>>> cur_tx: 2141779 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2141772 tx_left: 7
>>> 1881381:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3251.750718: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 26 cur_tx: 2141786 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2141779 tx_left: 7
>>> //something happens, the output queue empties.. now it is fast, and 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit is not called from soft_irq
>>> 1896178:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  3252.595994: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 23 
>>> cur_tx: 2141911 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2141911 tx_left: 0
>>> 1896196:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3252.596055: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 24 cur_tx: 2141912 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2141911 tx_left: 1
>>> 1923136:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  3253.596227: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 50 
>>> cur_tx: 2142066 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142066 tx_left: 0
>>> 1923154:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3253.596289: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 51 cur_tx: 2142067 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142066 tx_left: 1
>>> 1951633:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  3254.596459: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 5 
>>> cur_tx: 2142213 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142213 tx_left: 0
>>> 1951651:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3254.596521: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 6 cur_tx: 2142214 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142213 tx_left: 1
>>> 1954472:          hping3-2871  [001] ....  3255.596700: 
>>> rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 15 
>>> cur_tx: 2142223 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142223 tx_left: 0
>>> 1954490:          <idle>-0     [000] ..s.  3255.596763: 
>>> rtl8169_poll: ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 16 cur_tx: 2142224 
>>> frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142223 tx_left: 1
>>> //until it soon, again is slow..
>>>
>>>
>>> BR.
>>> Risto
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7.12.2018 16:46, Risto Pajula wrote:
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> I have been to track the poor forwarding latency to the TCP Window 
>>>> scale options. The Netgem device uses rather large windows scale 
>>>> options (x256) and I have been able to reproduce the routers poor 
>>>> forwarding latency also with linux box running in the internal 
>>>> network and changing the net.ipv4.tcp_rmem to a large value and 
>>>> thus changing the TCP window scaling options to larger ones. I 
>>>> still do not have clue why this causes the forwarfing in the linux 
>>>> kernel to block? Maybe something in the connection tracking....?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With the ICMP timestamp messages I have been able to also pinpoint 
>>>> that the latency is caused in the eth1 sending side (the following 
>>>> hping3 example is run in the router toward the internal network...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> xxx:/usr/src/linux-4.20-rc2 # hping3 192.168.0.112 --icmp --icmp-ts -V
>>>> using eth1, addr: 192.168.0.1, MTU: 1500
>>>> HPING 192.168.0.112 (eth1 192.168.0.112): icmp mode set, 28 headers 
>>>> + 0 data bytes
>>>> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=49464 tos=0 iplen=40
>>>> icmp_seq=0 rtt=7.9 ms
>>>> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52294891 Receive=52294895 Transmit=52294895
>>>> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=7
>>>>
>>>> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=49795 tos=0 iplen=40
>>>> icmp_seq=1 rtt=235.9 ms
>>>> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52295891 Receive=52296128 Transmit=52296128
>>>> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=235
>>>>
>>>> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=49941 tos=0 iplen=40
>>>> icmp_seq=2 rtt=3.8 ms
>>>> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52296891 Receive=52296895 Transmit=52296895
>>>> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=3
>>>>
>>>> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=50685 tos=0 iplen=40
>>>> icmp_seq=3 rtt=47.8 ms
>>>> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52297891 Receive=52297940 Transmit=52297940
>>>> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=47
>>>>
>>>> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=51266 tos=0 iplen=40
>>>> icmp_seq=4 rtt=7.7 ms
>>>> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52298891 Receive=52298895 Transmit=52298895
>>>> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=7
>>>>
>>>> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=52245 tos=0 iplen=40
>>>> icmp_seq=5 rtt=3.7 ms
>>>> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52299891 Receive=52299895 Transmit=52299895
>>>> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=3
>>>>
>>>> ^C
>>>> --- 192.168.0.112 hping statistic ---
>>>> 6 packets tramitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
>>>> round-trip min/avg/max = 3.7/51.1/235.9 ms
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BR.
>>>> Risto
>>>>
>>>> On 2.12.2018 23:32, Risto Pajula wrote:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can most likely ignore the "DF Bit, mtu bug when forwarding" 
>>>>> case. There isn't actually big IP packets on the wire, instead 
>>>>> there is burst of packets on the wire, which are combined by the 
>>>>> GRO... And thus dropping them should not happen. Sorry about the 
>>>>> invalid bug report.
>>>>>
>>>>> However the poor latency from intenal network to the internet 
>>>>> still remain, both GRO enabled and disabled. I will try to study 
>>>>> further...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BR.
>>>>> Risto
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2.12.2018 14:01, Risto Pajula wrote:
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have encountered a weird performance problem in Linux IP 
>>>>>> fragmentation when using video streaming services behind the NAT. 
>>>>>> Also I have studied a possible bug in the DF bit (don't fragment) 
>>>>>> handling when forwarding the IP packets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First the system setup description:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [host1]-int lan-(eth1)[linux router](eth0)-extlan-[fibre 
>>>>>> router]-internet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where:
>>>>>> host1: is a Netgem N7800 "cable box" for online video streaming 
>>>>>> services provided by local telco (Can access Netflix, HBO nordic, 
>>>>>> "live TV", etc.)
>>>>>> linux router: Linux computer with Dualcore Intel Celeron G1840, 
>>>>>> running currently Linux kernel 4.20.0-rc2, and openSUSE Leap 15.0
>>>>>> eth1: Linux Routers internal (NAT) interface, 192.168.0.1/24 
>>>>>> network, mtu set to 1500, RTL8169sb/8110sb
>>>>>> eth0: Linux Routers internet facing interface, public ip address, 
>>>>>> mtu set to 1500,  RTL8168evl/8111evl
>>>>>> fibre router: Alcatel Lucent fibre router (I-241G-Q), directly 
>>>>>> connected to the eth0 of the Linux router.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And now when using the Netgem N7800 with online video services 
>>>>>> (Netflix, HBO nordic, etc) the Linux router will receive very BIG 
>>>>>> IP packets in the eth0 upto ~20kB, this seems to lead to the 
>>>>>> following problems in the Linux IP stack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IP fragmentation performance:
>>>>>> When the Linux router receives these large IP packets in the eth0 
>>>>>> everything works, but it seems that them cause very large 
>>>>>> performance degradation from internal network to the internet 
>>>>>> regarding the latency when the IP fragmentation is performed. The 
>>>>>> ping latency from internal network to the internel network 
>>>>>> increases from stable 15ms-20ms up to 700-800ms AND also the ping 
>>>>>> from the internal network to the linux router eth1 (192.168.0.). 
>>>>>> However up link works perfectly, the ping is still stable when 
>>>>>> streaming the online services (From linux router to the 
>>>>>> internet). It seems that the IP fragmentation is somehow blocking 
>>>>>> the eth1 reception or transmission for very long time (which it 
>>>>>> shouldn't). I'm able to test and debug the issue further, but 
>>>>>> advice regarding where to look would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DF Bit, mtu bug when forwarding:
>>>>>> I have started to study the above mentioned problem and have 
>>>>>> found a possible bug in the DF bit and mtu handling in IP 
>>>>>> forwarding. The BIG packets received from streaming services all 
>>>>>> have the "DF bit" set and the question is that should we be 
>>>>>> forwarding them at all as that would result them being 
>>>>>> fragmented? Apparently we currently are... I have traced this 
>>>>>> down to the ip_forward.c function ip_exceeds_mtu(), and the 
>>>>>> following patch seems to fix that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- net/ipv4/ip_forward.c.orig  2018-12-02 11:09:32.764320780 +0200
>>>>>> +++ net/ipv4/ip_forward.c       2018-12-02 12:53:25.031232347 +0200
>>>>>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static bool ip_exceeds_mtu(const struct
>>>>>>                  return false;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          /* original fragment exceeds mtu and DF is set */
>>>>>> -       if (unlikely(IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu))
>>>>>> +        if (unlikely(skb->len > mtu))
>>>>>>                  return true;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          if (skb->ignore_df)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This seems to work (in some ways) - after the change IP packets 
>>>>>> that are too large to the internal network get dropped and we are 
>>>>>> sending "ICMP Destination unreachable, The datagram is too big" 
>>>>>> messages to the originator (as we should?). However it seems that 
>>>>>> not all services really like this... Netflix behaves as expected 
>>>>>> and ping is stable from internal network to the internet, but for 
>>>>>> example HBO nordic will not work anymore (too little buffering? 
>>>>>> Retransimissions not working?). So it seems the original issue 
>>>>>> should be also fixed (And the fragmention should be allowed?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS. Watching TV was not this intensive 20 years ago :)
>>>>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ