[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181213092630.GD1605@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:26:30 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com,
idosch@...lanox.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: Clarify switchdev
devices behavior
> +VLAN filtering
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +The Linux bridge allows the configuration of a VLAN filtering mode (compile and
> +run time) which must be observed by the underlying switchdev network
> +device/hardware:
> +
> +- with VLAN filtering turned off: frames ingressing the device with a VID that
> + is not programmed into the bridge/switch's VLAN table must be forwarded.
> +
> +- with VLAN filtering turned on: frames ingressing the device with a VID that is
> + not programmed into the bridges/switch's VLAN table must be dropped.
Hi Florian
i forget the details, but there are some difference between VLAN
filtering being disabled at compile time, and disabled at runtime. I
think the expected behaviour is the same, but the switchdev API usage
is slightly different.
> +- when IGMP snooping is turned on, multicast traffic must be selectively flowing
> + to the appropriate network ports and not flood the entire switch, that must
> + include the CPU/management port.
224.0.0.X/32 should always be flooded, IGMP is optional for those
groups in the local subnet.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists