netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: Clarify switchdev devices behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 15 Dec 2018 11:35:49 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, jiri@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: Clarify switchdev
 devices behavior

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:09:43 -0800

> This patch provides details on the expected behavior of switchdev
> enabled network devices when operating in a "stand alone" mode, as well
> as when being bridge members. This clarifies a number of things that
> recently came up during a bug fixing session on the b53 DSA switch
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review carefully, and let me know if you think some of the
> behaviors described below do not make any sense. Thanks!

Looks like Andrew had some feedback, so I'm expecting a new version
of this.