netdev - Self-XORing BPF registers is undefined behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG_fn=W55uuPbpvjzCphgiMbmhnFmmWY=KcOGvmUv14_JOGc5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:00:59 +0100
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Self-XORing BPF registers is undefined behavior

Hi BPF maintainers,

some time ago KMSAN found an issue in BPF code which we decided to
suppress at that point, but now I'd like to bring it to your
attention.
Namely, some BPF programs may contain instructions that XOR a register
with itself.
This effectively results in the following C code:
  regs[BPF_REG_A] = regs[BPF_REG_A] ^ regs[BPF_REG_A];
or
  regs[BPF_REG_X] = regs[BPF_REG_X] ^ regs[BPF_REG_X];
being executed.

According to the C11 standard this is undefined behavior, so KMSAN
reports an error in this case.

Do you think it's feasible to explicitly initialize the register
values like it's done here:
https://github.com/google/kmsan/commit/813c0f3d45ebfa321d70b4b06cc054518dd1d90d
?

Thanks,
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg