[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cdabfb9-afe6-3180-28c9-60507dcdc55e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 03:06:30 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Self-XORing BPF registers is undefined behavior
On 12/13/2018 03:00 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> Hi BPF maintainers,
>
> some time ago KMSAN found an issue in BPF code which we decided to
> suppress at that point, but now I'd like to bring it to your
> attention.
> Namely, some BPF programs may contain instructions that XOR a register
> with itself.
> This effectively results in the following C code:
> regs[BPF_REG_A] = regs[BPF_REG_A] ^ regs[BPF_REG_A];
> or
> regs[BPF_REG_X] = regs[BPF_REG_X] ^ regs[BPF_REG_X];
> being executed.
>
> According to the C11 standard this is undefined behavior, so KMSAN
> reports an error in this case.
eBPF is not C11 ;)
XOR boolean operation on a cpu is following boolean logic, which is much stronger than
any C standard.
>
> Do you think it's feasible to explicitly initialize the register
> values like it's done here:
> https://github.com/google/kmsan/commit/813c0f3d45ebfa321d70b4b06cc054518dd1d90d
> ?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander Potapenko
> Software Engineer
>
> Google Germany GmbH
> Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
> 80636 München
>
> Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists