[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5C11C08A.9030006@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:14:34 +0800
From: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] VSOCK: support mergeable rx buffer in vhost-vsock
On 2018/12/12 23:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:25:50PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote:
>> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve
>> high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the
>> idea of vhost-net about mergeable rx buffer and implement the mergeable
>> rx buffer in vhost-vsock, it can allow big packet to be scattered in
>> into different buffers and improve performance obviously.
>>
>> This series of patches mainly did three things:
>> - mergeable buffer implementation
>> - increase the max send pkt size
>> - add used and signal guest in a batch
>>
>> And I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly send big
>> packet(64K) included guest->Host and Host->Guest. I test performance
>> independently and the result as follows:
>>
>> Before performance:
>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth)
>> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s
>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s
>>
>> After performance only use implement mergeable rx buffer:
>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth)
>> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s
>> Host->Guest ~1280MB/s ~1350MB/s
>>
>> In this case, max send pkt size is still limited to 4K, so Host->Guest
>> performance will worse than before.
>
> It's concerning though, what if application sends small packets?
> What is the source of the slowdown? Do you know?
>
Hi Michael,
Before performance is tested by me one month ago, I don't retest this time,
this result can have some fluctuations, today I will retest all of cases
included small and big packets, and try to find out the slowdown reason.
Thanks,
Yiwen.
>> After performance increase the max send pkt size to 64K:
>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth)
>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s
>> Host->Guest ~1500MB/s ~2440MB/s
>>
>> After performance all patches are used:
>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth)
>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s
>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s
>>
>> >From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest
>> memory will not be wasted.
>>
>> In addition, in order to support mergeable rx buffer in virtio-vsock,
>> we need to add a qemu patch to support parse feature.
>>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>> * Addressed comments from Jason Wang.
>> * Add performance test result independently.
>> * Use Skb_page_frag_refill() which can use high order page and reduce
>> the stress of page allocator.
>> * Still use fixed size(PAGE_SIZE) to fill rx buffer, because too small
>> size can't fill one full packet, we only 128 vq num now.
>> * Use iovec to replace buf in struct virtio_vsock_pkt, keep tx and rx
>> consistency.
>> * Add virtio_transport ops to get max pkt len, in order to be compatible
>> with old version.
>> ---
>>
>> Yiwen Jiang (5):
>> VSOCK: support fill mergeable rx buffer in guest
>> VSOCK: support fill data to mergeable rx buffer in host
>> VSOCK: support receive mergeable rx buffer in guest
>> VSOCK: increase send pkt len in mergeable mode to improve performance
>> VSOCK: batch sending rx buffer to increase bandwidth
>>
>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 13 +-
>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 +
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 229 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 66 ++++++---
>> 5 files changed, 411 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists